WPPR formula change to v5.2 for 2016!

Project Numbers 5.2Since the release of WPPR v5.1 back in April 2015, the IFPA has continued investigating ways to make the World Pinball Player Rankings more accurate for how we rank players across the globe. This latest change to the formula is not nearly as extensive as the change to version 5.0 where we completely overhauled how the value of a tournament was calculated.

These latest changes will be incorporated into WPPR v5.2 which will be implemented starting January 1, 2016.

Please note that for all 2015 IFPA related activities (qualifying for 2015-16 SCS, 2015-16 ECS, IFPA13, etc), version 5.1 will be used for that qualification process.

Below is an overview of changes for the updated 2016 formula:

  • The IFPA will no longer endorse tournaments that don’t have a DIRECT play component as part of the format. DIRECT play represents multiple players playing against one another on a given game (head-to-head or in a group). Many tournaments use an INDIRECT qualifying system where everyone plays the same game (PAPA style qualifying, Best Game qualifying, Pin-Golf). Those tournaments that use an INDIRECT qualifying system must now run a Finals round that consists of DIRECT play between the finalists to crown the winner. A tournament must advance a minimum of 10% but no more than 50% of those players to the Final. Examples of tournaments no longer eligible for WPPR points would be simple high score tournaments without finals, or Pin-Golf tournaments where you simply play your round/rounds.
  • Originally WPPR v5.0 rules used the longest theoretical path to determine the number of meaningful games used for TGP. This made for situations where the tournament was being given credit for a “longest path” that had an extremely low chance of actually happening. We are changing this to ‘expected value’ for # of rounds played for bracket/strike/match play tournaments. We’ve included a detailed breakdown of a few approved qualifying and finals formats, and the number of games that should be counted towards the TGP value here: http://www.ifpapinball.com/tgpguide2016
  • RATED players will be the metric that is used to determine the Dynamic distribution part of the WPPR points awarded for an event. For example a tournament with 300 players in which only 50 were rated will base the dynamic distribution of points as if it was a 50 player tournament.
  • Match play formats or formats that utilize PAPA style group finals with 4-player groups will be allowed to count each meaningful game played at 2X. For example, a 3-game round with 4-player groups will now count as 6 additional games added to TGP instead of just 3. This is detailed in the TGP Guide under the “PAPA Style Match Play” approved format.
  • The IFPA no longer gives additional credit to matches that are longer than 7 games towards the TGP calculation. For example, best-of-9 matches will still only add 7 games to TGP.

For full detailed information on the 2016 formula, click HERE. Any questions please don’t hesitate to contact us at ifpapinball@gmail.com. Please check back when for announce that WPPR v5.2 has been implemented for 2016 as the details may always change prior to launch.

10 responses to “WPPR formula change to v5.2 for 2016!”

  1. Dayvv Brooks says:

    What is the definition of “rated player”? Do you still have to participate in 5 tourneys before you count as a “rated player”? Thanks!

  2. IFPA - International Flipper Pinball Association says:

    Definition hasn’t changed between v5.1 and v5.2 . . .
    “A player becomes an officially Rated player after participating in 5 IFPA endorsed events.”

  3. Colin MacAlpine says:

    (Edited) question about match play answered elsewhere.

  4. XericoPinball says:

    Will the IFPA sanction a tournament that has three (or more) tiers?  For example one round of indirect qualifying (cut 50%), one round of playoffs and one final round of championships

  5. ifpapinball says:

    XericoPinball For now that answer is yes 🙂

  6. Basci says:

    So does this mean, if there are 300 people at PAPA A bank that at least 30 people will advance to the finals?

  7. Tatsunori says:

    If there is no rated players (ex. new comunity), Can’t they hold IFPA tournament? (because Base Value + TVA = 0 )

  8. ifpapinball says:

    @Basci Yes, since PAPA style qualifying is ‘indirect’, they would have to advance a minimum of 30 players to the finals for us to endorse the tournament for WPPR’s.

  9. ifpapinball says:

    Tatsunori Yes, they can hold an IFPA endorsed tournament. It simply wouldn’t be worth any points until those players become rated. Consider the first 5 tournaments in that new community a “warm up” 🙂

  10. Germain says:

    ifpapinball Well A last year only had 100 player so I am not too worried about that though Pinburgh would be an issue right? 650 players but “only” 40 in the A final?

Leave a Reply